Skip to main content
Drizzle
38.5 ° F
Full Weather | Burn Info
Sponsored By:

Something To Think About Archive

168 million acres of America’s forests reportedly burned from 2002-2024, with little replanted; nearly 1200 people died and over 145,000 structures were destroyed. The 2003 Healthy Forest Restoration Act, signed into law by President Bush, was objected to by the Sierra Club and many other “environmental” groups wrongly claiming that it would “gut environmental protections.” The Obama/Biden Administration ignored it and instead enacted even more rigorous environmental review requirements with an emphasis on “climate adaptive strategies.” It took the burning down of the right zip codes with the recent destructive wildfires in Los Angeles to finally get Washington’s attention again. We need passage of the proposed “Fix Our Forests Act” that will reduce wildfire threat by thinning overcrowded forests; streamlining environmental reviews; restoring forest ecosystems; and reducing the massive greenhouse gas emissions from wildfire smoke that directly impacts health and the environment.

According to British novelist David Ambrose, “If you have the will to win, you have achieved half your success. If you don’t, you have achieved half your failure.”

Like the feds, California has a spending problem, not a revenue problem. The non-partisan California Legislative Analyst has released a new report that’s a cautionary tale for America as Gavin Newsome prepares to make a run at the White House. Under the current trajectory, California will spend more money than it will take in via tax revenue facing a projected $18 billion budget shortfall for the upcoming fiscal year 2026-27 that starts on July 1st. The report adds, “Starting in 2027-28, we estimate structural deficits to grow to about $35 billion annually due to spending growth continuing to outstrip revenue growth.” And no one-time tax on billionaires will fix that.

The recent spate of gerrymandering congressional districts by states run by one party or the other, be it Texas or California, is that the voters in those districts end up being the real losers when they are politically trapped by their statehouse and no longer have a real say in the direction that their representatives take them. If the statehouse has decided that you now live in a district controlled by one party or another, you have no real control over who represents you in Congress.

Publisher B.C. Forbes claimed that “A man’s success or failure is determined as much by how he acts during his leisure as by how he acts during his work hours.”

T.S. Eliot wrote: “Whatever you think, be sure it is what you thin; whatever you want, be sure that it is what you want; whatever you feel, be sure that it is what you feel.”

During the government shutdown, President Trump kept pushing for Republicans to end the filibuster, if for only as a one-off for the shutdown. Unfortunately, it doesn’t work that way. The filibuster is there to prevent one party from ruling by fiat when they hold just a slim majority in the Senate that could be for as little as two years. No matter which side of the aisle you sit on, at some point you’ll be glad that it takes a 60-vote majority to pass legislation. Can you imagine the damage that could be done with an extremist-dominated red or blue party and only 51 votes?  The filibuster exists to get consensus by a real majority, consisting of left, right and center.